ABOUT OUR NAME
In Greek mythos, Praxidice was venerated as the goddess of exacting justice. Orphic hymns exalt her as the steward of moral order through casting judgment upon those guilty of violating social norms and conventional rules. The daughter of Zeus and Themis, Praxidice is depicted as the embodiment of virtue and one of the three divine personages of Justice.
Downtown Aspen Investments v. Aspen Legacy Holdings, 2014 CA 2110 (Colo.App. 2014), pending
Antero Resources Corp. v. Strudley, 2014 WL 1357327 (Colo. 2014), pending
Smith v. Newport Capital Holdings, 2014 CA 877 (Colo.App 2014 ) pending
Luedke v. Dynam, LLC, 2013 CA 1244 (Colo.App 2014)
Spring Park Ventures, LLC v. Spring Park Meadows Ass'n, 2014 WL 490572 (Colo.App. 2014)
Strudley v. Antero Resources Corp., --P.3d-- (Colo.App.2013), cert pending
Weitz Co., LLC v. Capitol Peak Lodge Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 2013 WL 6152421 (D. Colo. 2013)
Torres v. Cache Cache, Ltd., 2012 WL 6652856 (D. Colo. 2012)
Foley v. Cordillera Golf Club, LLC, 2012 WL 1144856 (D. Colo.2012)
Capitol Peak Lodge v. Irish Jewel Dev. Co., 2012 WL4454403 (Colo.App.2012)
Hibnick v. Walsh, (9th Cir. 2011)
Grosz v. Zale, 2011 WL 3505464 (Colo.App. 2011)
Bell Colorado, Ltd. v. Related Westpac, LLC, 2011 WL 486185 (D. Colo. 2011)
In re Google Buzz Privacy Litigation, 2011 WL 7460099 (N.D. Cal. 2011)
Advantek Pro, Inc. v. ADT Sec. Servs., Inc., 2011 WL 4837298 (Colo.App. 2011)
Meyerstein v. City of Aspen, 282 P.3d 456 (Colo.App. 2011)
Bell Colorado, Ltd. v. Related Westpac, LLC, 2011 WL 486185, (D.Colo. 2011)
Platt v. Aspenwood Condominium Ass'n, 214 P.3d 1060 (Colo. App. 2009)
McDonough v. Janckila Construction, 2009 WL 3491138 (Colo.App.2009)
Ripple Resort Media, Inc. v. SkiView Corp., 2008 WL 4678518 (D. Colo. 2008)
Colorado Sporting Club, Inc. v. Gypsum Partners, LLC, 2008 WL 2206849 (Colo.App. 2008)
Joshua & Co. of Aspen, Inc. v. Oliphant, 2007 WL 2410845 (Colo. 2007)
Clynke v. Waneka, 157 P.3d 1072 (Colo. 2007)
Joshua & Co. of Aspen, Inc. v. Oliphant, 2006 WL 2975622 (Colo.App. 2006)
Waneka v. Clyncke, 134 P.3d 492 (Colo.App. 2005)
Blue Ridge Capital v. Wilkinson, 2004 WL 2677708 (Colo. App. 2004)
Murrell v. School Dist. No. 1, 186 F.3d 1238 (10th Cir. 1999)
"Wow. The jury was mesmerized by you. The paralegal with the other firm was sitting there just
sobbing during your opening statement. I couldn't believe it. You were absolutely amazing."
"Brilliant! The other side never even anticipated our strategy.
Thank you for your masterful handling of these difficult negotiations."
"Pete, I want to take a minute and thank you for everything. We appreciate your help so much.
It was awesome to see you in action. We never expected such great results."
"Thank you so much for all you have done over the years. You are a joy to work with and exceedingly competent in
the ways of the law. If the occasion arises to recommend a lawyer, you will be at the very top of the list."
"I lost everything, including all hope, until I was referred to you. I don't know where I
would be today without you. Thank you, thank you, thank you."
"Thank you so much for all your great work on this deal. I really value your friendship and consider
you to be the tops of your profession. There's no one better than you, in my opinion."
"Congratulations on settling our case. I want to thank you for the excelled services you provided us.
Clearly, your hard work, research and legal expertise paid off in resolving the situation.
I am certainly grateful that Paul Rudnick referred us to you! Thank you!"
"Thank you so much! I could not be more pleased with your exceptional handling of this very complex matter."
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.
Past results afford no guarantee of future results. Every case is different and must be judged on its own merits.
* COLORADO DOES NOT CERTIFY LAWYERS AS SPECIALISTS IN ANY FIELD